Skip to main content

Drivers of predator killing by rural residents and recommendations for fostering coexistence in agricultural landscapes

Gálvez, Nicolás, St John, Freya A.V., Davies, Zoe G. (2021) Drivers of predator killing by rural residents and recommendations for fostering coexistence in agricultural landscapes. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 2 . Article Number 712044. E-ISSN 2673-611X. (doi:10.3389/fcosc.2021.712044) (KAR id:101047)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English

Click to download this file (1MB) Preview
[thumbnail of Galvez et al. Frontiers in Conservation Science 2021.pdf]
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Official URL:


Predators inhabiting human-dominated landscapes are vulnerable to various anthropogenic actions, including people killing them. We assess potential drivers of predator killing in an agricultural landscape in southern Chile, and discuss the implications for policies and interventions to promote coexistence. We evaluate five different types of motivation: (i) sociodemographics and household economy; (ii) livestock loss; (iii) predator encounter rates; (iv) knowledge of legal protection (all native predators are currently protected); and, (v) tolerance to livestock predation. As the killing of native predators is illegal, the prevalence of this behaviour by rural residents was estimated using a symmetrical forced-response randomised response technique (RRT), a method designed to ask sensitive questions. A total of 233 rural residents from randomly assigned sample units (4 km2) across the study region completed our questionnaire. More conspicuous species, such as hawks (Falconiformes sp), foxes (Lycalopex sp) and free-roaming domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris), were killed by a higher proportion of farmers than more cryptic species, like the felid güiña (Leopardus guigna), skunk (Conepatus chinga) and pumas (Puma concolor). The proportion of respondents admitting to killing predators was highest for hawks (mean= 0.46, SE= 0.08), foxes (mean= 0.29, SE= 0.08) and dogs (mean= 0.30, SE= 0.08) and lowest for güiña (mean= 0.10, SE = 0.09), which is the only species of conservation concern we examine (considered Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List). From our five motivation categories, past killing of predators was associated with higher reported predator encounter rates (guina, hawks), lower tolerance to livestock predation (hawks, dogs), higher reported livestock loss (dogs) and sociodemographics and household economy (foxes). Our results demonstrate that a one-size-fits-all approach to predator persecution is unlikely to reduce or eliminate illegal killings for the suite of species we examined. We identify and describe two main types of intervention that could foster coexistence, improvement of livestock management and domestic dog management in rural areas, as well as discussing the potential for social marketing.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.3389/fcosc.2021.712044
Uncontrolled keywords: carnivores; free-roaming dogs; illegal behavior; Leopardus guigna; livestock predation; random response technique; tolerance to predation
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH75 Conservation (Biology)
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
Depositing User: Zoe Davies
Date Deposited: 24 Apr 2023 20:31 UTC
Last Modified: 25 Apr 2023 09:43 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Davies, Zoe G.:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.