Agarwal, Ashok, Farkouh, Ala’a, Saleh, Ramadan, Abdel-Meguid Hamoda, Taha Abo-Almagd, Harraz, Ahmed M., Kavoussi, Parviz, Arafa, Mohamed, Salvio, Gianmaria, Rambhatla, Amarnath, Toprak, Tuncay, and others. (2023) Controversy and Consensus on Indications for Sperm DNA Fragmentation Testing in Male Infertility: A Global Survey, Current Guidelines, and Expert Recommendations. The World Journal of Men's Health, 41 (3). pp. 575-602. ISSN 2287-4208. E-ISSN 2287-4690. (doi:10.5534/wjmh.220282) (KAR id:101000)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/4MB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.220282 |
Abstract
Purpose: Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) testing was recently added to the sixth edition of the World Health Organization laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Many conditions and risk factors have been associated with elevated SDF; therefore, it is important to identify the population of infertile men who might benefit from this test. The purpose of this study was to investigate global practices related to indications for SDF testing, compare the relevant professional society guideline recommendations, and provide expert recommendations.
Materials and Methods: Clinicians managing male infertility were invited to take part in a global online survey on SDF clinical practices. This was conducted following the CHERRIES checklist criteria. The responses were compared to professional society guideline recommendations related to SDF and the appropriate available evidence. Expert recommendations on indications for SDF testing were then formulated, and the Delphi method was used to reach consensus.
Results: The survey was completed by 436 experts from 55 countries. Almost 75% of respondents test for SDF in all or some men with unexplained or idiopathic infertility, 39% order it routinely in the work-up of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), and 62.2% investigate SDF in smokers. While 47% of reproductive urologists test SDF to support the decision for varicocele repair surgery when conventional semen parameters are normal, significantly fewer general urologists (23%; p=0.008) do the same. Nearly 70% would assess SDF before assisted reproductive technologies (ART), either always or for certain conditions. Recurrent ART failure is a common indication for SDF testing. Very few society recommendations were found regarding SDF testing.
Conclusions: This article presents the largest global survey on the indications for SDF testing in infertile men, and demonstrates diverse practices. Furthermore, it highlights the paucity of professional society guideline recommendations. Expert recommendations are proposed to help guide clinicians.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.5534/wjmh.220282 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Pharmacology (medical), Urology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Policy, Aging, Reproductive Medicine, Delphi method; DNA fragmentation; Male infertility; Practice guidelines; Sperm; Survey |
Subjects: | Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Biosciences |
SWORD Depositor: | JISC Publications Router |
Depositing User: | JISC Publications Router |
Date Deposited: | 20 Apr 2023 10:13 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 13:06 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/101000 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):