Journal list menu

Accepted Articles
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Riparian buffers act as microclimatic refugia in oil palm landscapes

Joseph Williamson

Corresponding Author

School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E14NS UK

Corresponding authors

Email: joseph.williamson@qmul.ac.uk

Email: s.j.rossiter@qmul.ac.uk

Search for more papers by this author
Eleanor M. Slade

Asian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore City, 639798 Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah H. Luke

Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE), School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ UK

Search for more papers by this author
Tom Swinfield

Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge Conservation Research Institute, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EA UK

Search for more papers by this author
Arthur Y.C. Chung

Forest Research Centre, Sabah Forestry Department, P.O. Box 1407, 90715 Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia

Search for more papers by this author
David A. Coomes

Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge Conservation Research Institute, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EA UK

Search for more papers by this author
Herry Heroin

Institute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, 88440 Sabah, Malaysia

Search for more papers by this author
Tommaso Jucker

School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Ave, Bristol, BS8 1TQ UK

Search for more papers by this author
Owen T. Lewis

Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS UK

Search for more papers by this author
Charles S. Vairappan

Institute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, 88440 Sabah, Malaysia

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen J. Rossiter

Corresponding Author

School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E14NS UK

Corresponding authors

Email: joseph.williamson@qmul.ac.uk

Email: s.j.rossiter@qmul.ac.uk

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew J. Struebig

Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE), School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 October 2020

This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi:10.1111/1365‐2664.13784

Abstract

  1. There is growing interest in the ecological value of set‐aside habitats around rivers in tropical agriculture. These riparian buffers typically comprise forest or other non‐production habitat, and are established to maintain water quality and hydrological processes, whilst also supporting biodiversity, ecosystem function and landscape connectivity.
  2. We investigated the capacity for riparian buffers to act as microclimatic refugia by combining field‐based measurements of temperature, humidity, and dung beetle communities with remotely‐sensed data from LiDAR across an oil palm dominated landscape in Borneo.
  3. Riparian buffers offer a cool and humid habitat relative to surrounding oil palm plantations, with wider buffers characterised by conditions comparable to riparian sites in continuous logged forest.
  4. High vegetation quality and topographic sheltering were strongly associated with cooler and more humid microclimates in riparian habitats across the landscape. Variance in beetle diversity was also predicted by both proximity‐to‐edge and microclimatic conditions within the buffer, suggesting that narrow buffers amplify the negative impacts that high temperatures have on biodiversity.
  5. Synthesis and applications. Widely‐legislated riparian buffer widths of 20‐30 m each side of a river may provide drier and less humid microclimatic conditions than continuous forest. Adopting wider buffers and maintaining high vegetation quality will ensure set‐asides established for hydrological reasons bring co‐benefits for terrestrial biodiversity, both now, and in the face of anthropogenic climate change.