Bohner, G. and Danner, U. and Siebler, F. and Samson, G. (2002) Rape Myth Acceptance and Judgments of Vulnerability to Sexual Assault: An Internet Experiment. Experimental Psychology, 49 (4). pp. 257-269. ISSN 1618-3169 .
This is the latest version of this item.
|The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)|
Processing strategies in risk assessment were studied in an Internet experiment. 399 women aged 16 yrs old and older, who were either low or high in rape myth acceptance (RMA), were asked to recall either 2 or 6 behaviors that either increase or decrease the risk of being sexually assaulted. Later they judged their personal vulnerability to sexual assault under either no time pressure (no response deadline) or time pressure (response deadline of 5 sec). Without time pressure, the results were opposite to previous research: Women low in RMA relied on ease of recall and reported higher vulnerability after recalling few rather than many risk-increasing behaviors, or many rather than few risk-decreasing behaviors; women high in RMA relied on the amount of information recalled, which resulted in an opposite pattern of vulnerability judgments. No influences of ease of recall or amount recalled on vulnerability judgments were detected under time pressure.
|Uncontrolled keywords:||rape; judgment under uncertainty; heuristic processing|
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology|
|Divisions:||Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Psychology > Social Psychology|
|Depositing User:||Gary Samson|
|Date Deposited:||02 Oct 2008 20:55|
|Last Modified:||14 Jan 2010 14:34|
|Resource URI:||http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/9348 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)|
Available versions of this item
- Rape Myth Acceptance and Judgments of Vulnerability to Sexual Assault: An Internet Experiment. (deposited 02 Oct 2008 20:55) [Currently Displayed]
- Depositors only (login required):