Carpenter, G.I. and Perry, M. and Challis, C. and Hope, K. (2003) Identification of registered nursing care of residents in English nursing homes using the minimum data set resident assessment instrument (MDS/RAI) and resource utilization groups version 111 (RUG-111). Age and Ageing, 32 (3). pp. 279-285.
|The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)|
Aim: to determine if a combination of Minimum Data Set/Resident Assessment Instrument (MDS/RAI) assessment variables and the Resource Utilisation Groups version III (RUG-III) case-mix system could be used as a method of identifying and reimbursing registered nursing care needs in long-term care. Method: the sample included 193 nursing home residents from four nursing homes from three different locations and care providers in England. The study included assessments of residents’ care needs using either the MDS/RAI assessments or RUG stand-alone questionnaires and a time study that recorded the amount of nursing time received by residents over a 24-h period. Validity of RUG-III for explaining the distribution of care time between residents in different RUG-III groups was tested. The difference in direct and indirect care provided by registered general nurses (RGN) and care assistants (CA) to residents in RUG-III clinical groups was compared. Results: the RUG-III system explained 56% of the variance in care time (Eta2, P=0.0001). Residents in RUG-III groups associated with particular medical and nursing needs (enhanced RGN care) received more than twice as much indirect RGN care time (t-test, P-0.001) and 1.4 times as much direct RGN and direct CA time (t-test, P-0.01) than residents with primarily cognitive impairment or physical problems only (standard RGN care). Residents with enhanced RGN care received an average of 48.1 min of RGN care in 24 h (95% CI 4.1–55.2) compared with an average of 31.1 min (95% CI 26.8–35.5) for residents in the standard RGN care group. A third low RGN care group was created following publication of the Department of Health guidance on NHS Funded Nursing Care. With three levels, the enhanced care group receives about 38% more than the standard group, and the low group receives about 50% of the standard group. Conclusions: the RUG-III system effectively differentiated between nursing home residents who are receiving ‘low’, ‘standard’ and ‘enhanced’ RGN care time. The findings could provide the basis of a reimbursement system for registered nursing time in long-term care facilities in the UK.
|Uncontrolled keywords:||elderly, assessment, long-term care, reimbursement, case-mix|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences
H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare
|Divisions:||Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Social Policy Sociology and Social Research > Centre for Health Services Studies
Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Social Policy Sociology and Social Research
|Depositing User:||Samantha Osborne|
|Date Deposited:||19 Dec 2007 18:26|
|Last Modified:||24 Sep 2010 12:52|
|Resource URI:||http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/722 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)|
- Depositors only (login required):