Skip to main content

Conservation practice could benefit from routine testing and publication of management outcomes

Sutherland, William J., Mitchell, Roger, Walsh, Jessica, Amano, Tatsya, Ausden, Malcolm, Beebee, Trevor J.C., Bullock, David, Daniels, Mike, Deutsch, James, Griffiths, Richard A., and others. (2013) Conservation practice could benefit from routine testing and publication of management outcomes. Conservation Evidence, 10 . pp. 1-3. ISSN 1758-2067. (KAR id:54249)

Abstract

Effective conservation requires a step change in the way practitioners can contribute to science and

can have access to research outputs. The journal Conservation Evidence was established in 2004 to

help practitioners surmount several obstacles they face when attempting to document the effects of

their conservation actions scientifically. It is easily and freely accessible online. It is free to publish in

and it enables global communication of the effects of practical trials and experiments, which are

virtually impossible to get published in most scientific journals. The driving force behind

Conservation Evidence is the need to generate and share scientific information about the effects of

interventions.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH75 Conservation (Biology)
Q Science > QK Botany
Q Science > QL Zoology
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
Depositing User: Richard Griffiths
Date Deposited: 22 Feb 2016 09:24 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Feb 2021 13:33 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/54249 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Griffiths, Richard A..

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5533-1013
CReDIT Contributor Roles:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.