Managing Outbreaks of Invasive Species: Eradication Versus Suppression

Fraser, Robert and Cook, David and Mumford, John D. and Wilby, Andy and Waage, Jeff K. (2006) Managing Outbreaks of Invasive Species: Eradication Versus Suppression. International Journal of Pest Management, 52 (4). pp. 261-268. ISSN 0967-0874. (The full text of this publication is not available from this repository)

The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09670870600795930

Abstract

A framework is developed to evaluate eradication as one of three alternative management responses to an outbreak of an invasive species: eradication, suppression or no action. This framework can be used to establish under what conditions an eradication option could provide an expected net economic benefit, and whether this net benefit exceeds that of the other two options. The eradication option is more likely to be preferred in situations where there is an immediate export benefit that is derived from eradication of the outbreak, and also the uncertainty associated with the likely success of eradication is low.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled keywords: invasive species; eradication; export benefit
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > Kent Business School
Depositing User: Robert Fraser
Date Deposited: 17 Sep 2008 11:12
Last Modified: 24 Apr 2014 15:42
Resource URI: http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/5195 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):