Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Employing the citizens' jury technique to elicit reasoned public judgments about environmental risk: insights from an inquiry into the governance of microbial water pollution

Fish, R, Winter, Michael, Oliver, David M., Chadwick, Dave R., Hodgson, Chris J., Heathwaite, A. Louise (2013) Employing the citizens' jury technique to elicit reasoned public judgments about environmental risk: insights from an inquiry into the governance of microbial water pollution. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57 (2). pp. 233-253. ISSN 0964-0568. (doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.738326) (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:50859)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of Fish et al 2014 Citizens Jury.pdf]
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.738326

Abstract

Devising policy instruments and interventions that can manage and mitigate the risks associated with microbial watercourse pollution is a significant concern of the contemporary environmental protection agenda. This paper reports on the work of a citizens' jury that sought to elicit reasoned public judgments about the nature and acceptability of these risks as they relate to the role of livestock farming, and what might constitute socially acceptable and sustainable pathways to their management. By exploring this issue through a logical and sequential process of risk characterisation, risk assessment and risk management, the paper reveals how citizens' juries can be used to contextualise and structure science-policy apprehensions of microbial watercourse pollution, and highlight where priorities for innovation and intervention might lie. Reactions and responses of participants to the jury process and its outputs, including issues of social and practical impact of the exercise, are also considered. The jury technique is argued to be useful in the way it cuts across disparate domains of responsibility and expertise for the governance of environmental risks, and therein challenges decision makers to think more broadly about the political, moral and economic framings of otherwise narrowly conceived science-policy problems.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1080/09640568.2012.738326
Uncontrolled keywords: water quality, livestock farming, risk assessment, public participation, citizens' jury
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > G Geography (General)
S Agriculture
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation
Depositing User: Robert Fish
Date Deposited: 15 Oct 2015 10:06 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 10:21 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/50859 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.