Incurvati, L., Murzi, Julien (2008) How Basic is the Basic Revisionary Argument? Analysis, 68 (4). pp. 303-309. ISSN 0003-2638. (doi:10.1093/analys/68.4.303) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:48957)
| The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
| Official URL: http://doi.org/10.1093/analys/68.4.303 |
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1093/analys/68.4.303 |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
| Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Arts and Humanities > School of Culture and Languages |
| Depositing User: | Fiona Symes |
| Date Deposited: | 08 Jun 2015 15:20 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 16 Nov 2021 10:20 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/48957 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):
Altmetric
Altmetric
