Wilkinson, D.T. and Halligan, P.W. (2004) The relevance of behavioural measures for functional-imaging studies of cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5 (1). pp. 67-73. ISSN 1471-003X.
|The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)|
The psychological structure of cognition is often inferred from conjoint measures of behaviour (such as reaction time) and brain activation (such as cerebral blood flow). In many experiments these measures produce divergent results. One example is v^^here a significant pattern of brain activation occurs without a corresponding change in overt behaviour. In such circumstances, can cognitive theory be informed from brainactivation data alone? Or, given the more established link between behaviour and cognition, is behavioural corroboration necessary?
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology|
|Divisions:||Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Psychology|
|Depositing User:||C.A. Simms|
|Date Deposited:||10 Jun 2008 18:42|
|Last Modified:||16 Dec 2011 16:01|
|Resource URI:||http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/4579 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)|
- Depositors only (login required):