Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Asymmetry, commitment and inhibition in the GroE ATPase cycle impose alternating functions on the two GroEL rings

Kad, Neil M, Ranson, N A, Cliff, M J, Clarke, A R (1998) Asymmetry, commitment and inhibition in the GroE ATPase cycle impose alternating functions on the two GroEL rings. Journal of molecular biology, 278 (1). pp. 267-278. ISSN 0022-2836. (doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.1704) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:42956)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided.
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1998.1704

Abstract

The ATPase cycle of GroE chaperonins has been examined by transient kinetics to dissect partial reactions in complexes where GroEL is asymmetrically loaded with nucleotides. The occupation of one heptameric ring by ADP does not inhibit the loading of the other with ATP nor does it prevent the consequent structural rearrangement to the "open" state. However, ADP binding completely inhibits ATP hydrolysis in the asymmetric complex, i.e. ATP cannot by hydrolysed when ADP is bound to the other ring. This non-competitive inhibition of the ATPase by ADP is consistent with a ring-switching, or "two-stroke", mechanism of the type: ATP:GroEL --> ADP:GroEL --> ADP:GroEL:ATP --> GroEL:ATP --> GroEL:ADP, i.e. with respect to the GroEL rings, ATP turns over in an alternating fashion. When the ATP-stabilized, "open" state is challenged with hexokinase and glucose, to quench the free ATP, the open state relaxes slowly (0.44 s-1) back to the apo (or closed) conformation. This rate, however, is three times faster than the hydrolytic step, showing that bound ATP is not committed to hydrolysis. When GroES is bound to the GroEL:ATP complex and the system is quenched in the same way, approximately half of the bound ATP undergoes hydrolysis on the chaperonin complex showing that the co-protein increases the degree of commitment. Thus, non-competitive inhibition of ATP hydrolysis, combined with the ability of the co-protein to block ligand exchange between rings has the effect of imposing a reciprocating cycle of reactions with ATP hydrolysing, and GroES binding, on each of the GroEL rings in turn. Taken together, these data imply that the dominant, productive steady state reaction in vivo is: GroEL:ATP:GroES --> GroEL:ADP:GroES --> ATP:GroEL:ADP:GroES --> ATP:GroEL:ADP --> GroES:ATP:GroEL:ADP --> GroES:ATP:GroEL for a hemi-cycle, and that significant inhibi tion of hydrolysis may arise through the formation of a dead-end ADP:GroEL:ATP:GroES complex.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1704
Subjects: Q Science
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Biosciences
Depositing User: Neil Kad
Date Deposited: 15 Sep 2014 19:09 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 10:17 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/42956 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.