Skip to main content

Validity Beliefs and General Ideology can Influence Legal Case Judgments Differently

Giner-Sorolla, Roger, Chaiken, Shelly, Lutz, Stacey (2002) Validity Beliefs and General Ideology can Influence Legal Case Judgments Differently. Law and Human Behavior, 26 (5). pp. 507-526. ISSN 0147-7307. (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:4291)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided.

Abstract

Jurors sometimes enter a case both with prior beliefs about its likely validity and with more general ideologies that are relevant to the case. Although prior validity beliefs may serve as heuristics, directly biasing decisions when cognitive capacity is low, we hypothesized that ideology may bias systematic thought even when cognitive capacity is high. This experiment studied simulated individual juror decisions in a sex-discrimination case, measuring validity beliefs about such cases as well as feminist ideology, and exposing participants to 1 of 3 case versions under time pressure or no time pressure. Validity beliefs had a direct, heuristic impact on judgment only under time pressure. However, feminist ideology had a mediated influence on judgment via valenced thoughts about the evidence, even under no time pressure. Also, people with initially proplaintiff beliefs judged a woman's sex-discrimination suit more negatively than did prodefendants if the evidence was weak. The results suggest that when jurors can fully process information, validity expectancies might backfire if not supported by case evidence, but ideology can have a more pervasive influence on the decision-making process.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled keywords: attitudes; ideology; juror bias; juror decision making; time pressure
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: Roger Giner-Sorolla
Date Deposited: 07 Sep 2008 20:18 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 09:42 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/4291 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Giner-Sorolla, Roger.

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6690-8842
CReDIT Contributor Roles:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.