Crisp, R.J. and Walsh, J. and Hewstone, M. (2006) Crossed categorization in common ingroup contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,, 32 (9). pp. 1204-1218. ISSN 0146-1672.
|The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)|
In three experiments, the authors tested the hypothesis that a common ingroup context would moderate evaluations Of crossed category targets. In Experiment 1, the typical additive pattern of evaluation across artificial crossed category groups became a social inclusion pattern in a common ingroup context. In Experiment 2, the authors manipulated the importance of real crossed category targets. When the crossed groups were of low importance, the effects of imposing a common ingroup replicated those observed in Experiment 1. For important crossed groups, however, the additive pattern remained. In Experiment 3, the authors measured perceived importance of the crossed groups to social identity prior to introducing a common ingroup context. The effects of a common categorization on evaluations were again moderated by perceived importance. These findings are discussed in the context of integrating crossed categorization and common ingroup identity models of multiple categorization.
|Uncontrolled keywords:||crossed categorization; common ingroup identity; reducing prejudice; intergroup bias|
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology|
|Divisions:||Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Psychology|
|Depositing User:||Ros Beeching|
|Date Deposited:||04 Sep 2008 13:28|
|Last Modified:||14 Jan 2010 14:15|
|Resource URI:||http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/4212 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)|
- Depositors only (login required):