Skip to main content

Is the leniency asymmetry really dead? Misinterpreting asymmetry effects in criminal jury deliberation

Kerr, Norbert L., MacCoun, Robert J. (2012) Is the leniency asymmetry really dead? Misinterpreting asymmetry effects in criminal jury deliberation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15 (5). pp. 585-602. ISSN 1368-4302. (doi:10.1177/1368430212441639) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:41656)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided.
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430212441639

Abstract

Early jury simulation research, reviewed and meta-anyalysed by MacCoun and Kerr (1988), suggested a leniency asymmetry in criminal jury deliberations such that a given faction favoring acquittal will tend to have a greater chance of prevailing than would an equivalent sized faction favoring conviction. More recently, a handful of field studies of actual juries have reported either no such leniency asymmetry or one in the opposite direction (a severity asymmetry). A potential bias in the coding of these field studies’ data is identified, one that would tend to underestimate any leniency asymmetry. The data from three field studies are re-analyzed after correcting this purported coding bias. The results of these re-analyses show a leniency asymmetry effect, although one that is less pronounced than observed in mock jury studies. It is argued that this difference in degree (not existence) of leniency asymmetry can plausibly be attributed to greater imbalance in evidence strength in the typical actual trial relative to the typical stimulus case in simulation experiments. It is also noted that failure to observe such a leniency asymmetry effect in actual juries would raise important questions about their adherence to the reasonable doubt standard of proof.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1177/1368430212441639
Uncontrolled keywords: deliberation; jury; jury simulation; leniency asymmetry
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: M.L. Barnoux
Date Deposited: 01 Jul 2014 15:11 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 10:16 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/41656 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Kerr, Norbert L..

Creator's ORCID:
CReDIT Contributor Roles:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.