Skip to main content

“A Giant Leap for Mankind”, but What About Women? The Role of System-Justifying Ideologies in Predicting Attitudes Toward Sexist Language

Douglas, Karen, Sutton, Robbie M. (2014) “A Giant Leap for Mankind”, but What About Women? The Role of System-Justifying Ideologies in Predicting Attitudes Toward Sexist Language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, . ISSN 0261-927X. (doi:10.1177/0261927X14538638) (KAR id:41076)

PDF (Douglas & Sutton JLSP in press 2014) Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download this file
(PDF/161kB)
[thumbnail of Douglas & Sutton JLSP in press 2014]
Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14538638

Abstract

Sexist language excludes, trivializes or diminishes either gender. Despite efforts by many

professional bodies to encourage the use of nonsexist alternatives, sexist language use

persists across many languages. Further, research has shown that men are less supportive of

nonsexist language alternatives than women, and that this effect is mediated by attitudes

toward women. We propose that broader ideologies related to the perceived legitimacy of

dominance hierarchies and existing social systems also explain this gender gap. British

undergraduate participants completed measures of attitudes toward women, gender-specific

system justification, and social dominance orientation. They also completed an inventory of

attitudes toward sexist language. There was a strong gender difference in attitudes toward

sexist language that was significantly mediated by gender-specific system justification and

social dominance orientation. The relationship between gender and attitudes toward sexist

language therefore appears to be driven by broader ideologies that serve to keep women “in

their place”.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1177/0261927X14538638
Uncontrolled keywords: sexist language, sexism, attitudes toward women, system justification, social dominance orientation
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: Karen Douglas
Date Deposited: 15 May 2014 09:44 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Feb 2021 12:53 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/41076 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.