Mingers, J. (2001) Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology. Information Systems Research, 12 (3). pp. 240-259. ISSN 1047-7047.
|The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)|
This paper puts forward arguments in favor of a pluralist approach to IS research. Rather than advocating a single paradigm, be it interpretive or positivist, or even a plurality of paradigms within the discipline as a whole, it suggests that research results will be richer and more reliable if different research methods, preferably from different (existing) paradigms, are routinely combined together. The paper is organized into three sections after the Introduction. In 2, the main arguments for the desirability of multimethod research are put forward, while 3 discusses its feasibility in theory and practice. 4 outlines two frameworks that are helpful in designing mixed-method research studies. These are illustrated with a critical evaluation of three examples of empirical research.
|Uncontrolled keywords:||critical pluralism; IS research methods; methodology; multimethodology; paradigm; qualitative research; critical realism|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)|
|Divisions:||Faculties > Social Sciences > Kent Business School|
|Depositing User:||John Mingers|
|Date Deposited:||29 Aug 2008 18:53|
|Last Modified:||14 Jan 2010 14:13|
|Resource URI:||http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/3897 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)|
- Depositors only (login required):