Challenging Partial Intentionalism

Maes, H.R.V. (2008) Challenging Partial Intentionalism. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 7 (1). pp. 85-94. ISSN 1470-2029 . (Full text available)

PDF
Download (371kB) Preview
[img]
Preview
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/jvap.7.1.85_1

Abstract

Paisley Livingston claims that an artist’s intentions are successfully realized and hence determinate of the meaning of a work if and only if they are compatible and “mesh” with the linguistic and conventional meanings of the text or artefact taken in its target or intended context. I argue that this specific standard of success is not without its difficulties. First, I show how an artist’s intention can sometimes be constitutive of a work’s meaning even if there is no significant meshing between the artist’s intention and his work. Second, I argue against the claim that the artist’s intentions need to be compatible with the linguistic and conventional meanings of a text. Third, I discuss a case that creates a particular puzzle for Livingston since the intentions of the artist concerned are clearly not successfully realized, though they are compatible and mesh with all the relevant data. I conclude my paper by suggesting a solution to this puzzle.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled keywords: intention; interpretation; art; intentionalism
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BH Aesthetics
N Fine Arts > NX Arts in general
Divisions: Faculties > Humanities > School of Arts
Depositing User: Hans Maes
Date Deposited: 09 Oct 2012 13:00
Last Modified: 04 Feb 2013 10:46
Resource URI: http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/31436 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year