Boiten, Eerke and Derrick, John (2010) Incompleteness of Relational Simulations in the Blocking Paradigm. Science of Computer Programming, 75 . pp. 182-196. ISSN 0167-6423.
|The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)|
Refinement is the notion of development between formal specifications. For specifications given in a relational formalism, downward and upward simulations are the standard method to verify that a refinement holds, their usefulness based upon their soundness and joint completeness. This is known to be true for total relational specifications and has been claimed to hold for partial relational specifications in both the non-blocking and blocking interpretations. In this paper we show that downward and upward simulations in the blocking interpretation, where domains are ''guards'', are not jointly complete. This contradicts earlier claims in the literature. We illustrate this with an example (based on one recently constructed by Reeves and Streader) and then construct a proof to show why joint completeness fails in general.
|Uncontrolled keywords:||determinacy analysis, Craig interpolants|
|Subjects:||Q Science > QA Mathematics (inc Computing science) > QA 76 Software, computer programming,|
|Divisions:||Faculties > Science Technology and Medical Studies > School of Computing > Programming Languages and Systems Group|
|Depositing User:||Eerke Boiten|
|Date Deposited:||21 Sep 2012 09:49|
|Last Modified:||21 Sep 2012 09:49|
|Resource URI:||http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/30612 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)|
- Depositors only (login required):