Visit impacts and canyon management in the Blue Mountains, Australia: Canyoners' perspectives and wilderness management

Hardiman, Nigel and Burgin, Shelley (2010) Visit impacts and canyon management in the Blue Mountains, Australia: Canyoners' perspectives and wilderness management. Managing Leisure, 15 (4). pp. 264-278. ISSN 1360-6719. (The full text of this publication is not available from this repository)

The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13606719.2010.508667

Abstract

Recreation in natural areas has been promoted for numerous reasons (e.g., health, nature appreciation, education, financial gain) and leisure time spent in protected areas has increased substantially in popularity in recent decades. However, upkeep of such protected areas represents considerable financial outlay and to recoup these costs, tourism potentially provides a self-financing mechanism for ecological sustainability. In Australia, the adventure sport of canyoning has increased in popularity in the Blue Mountains National Park (Australia), part of a recently declared World Heritage Area, in parallel with an overall increase in wilderness recreation. This study sought canyoners’ perceptions of visit impacts, together with their attitudes to potential management of these unique areas. It also compares findings with American wilderness research outcomes. The results identify that the current level of traffic through the canyons was not considered to be detrimental to canyon visit enjoyment. While the findings were broadly similar, even at much lower visitation levels than American wilderness recreationists tolerate, Australian canyoners avoid heavily trafficked canyons. Although perceptions and attitudes differed with level of experience, overall, the conclusion is that the visitors encountered were tolerant of other canyoners and the discarded debris of past excursions. In this context, it is not surprising that most canyoners did not see an immediate need to implement further management restrictions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled keywords: human impact, wilderness experience, social impact, environmental impact, World Heritage recreation, visitation, experience level
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
Depositing User: Nigel Hardiman
Date Deposited: 18 Sep 2012 13:06
Last Modified: 25 Jan 2013 09:59
Resource URI: http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/30512 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):