Petanidou, Theodora and Kallimanis, Athanasios S. and Tzanopoulos, Joseph and Sgardelis, Stefanos P. and Pantis, John D. (2008) Long-term observation of a pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. Ecology Letters, 11 (6). pp. 564-575. ISSN 1461-023X.
|The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)|
We analysed the dynamics of a plant-pollinator interaction network of a scrub community surveyed over four consecutive years. Species composition within the annual networks showed high temporal variation. Temporal dynamics were also evident in the topology of the network, as interactions among plants and pollinators did not remain constant through time. This change involved both the number and the identity of interacting partners. Strikingly, few species and interactions were consistently present in all four annual plant-pollinator networks (53% of the plant species, 21% of the pollinator species and 4.9% of the interactions). The high turnover in species-to-species interactions was mainly the effect of species turnover (c. 70% in pairwise comparisons among years), and less the effect of species flexibility to interact with new partners (c. 30%). We conclude that specialization in plant-pollinator interactions might be highly overestimated when measured over short periods of time. This is because many plant or pollinator species appear as specialists in 1 year, but tend to be generalists or to interact with different partner species when observed in other years. The high temporal plasticity in species composition and interaction identity coupled with the low variation in network structure properties (e.g. degree centralization, connectance, nestedness, average distance and network diameter) imply (i) that tight and specialized coevolution might not be as important as previously suggested and (ii) that plant-pollinator interaction networks might be less prone to detrimental effects of disturbance than previously thought. We suggest that this may be due to the opportunistic nature of plant and animal species regarding the available partner resources they depend upon at any particular time.
|Uncontrolled keywords:||apparent vs. real specialization, coevolution, ecological networks, food web structure, Mediterranean scrub, nestedness analysis, network analysis, sampling effort|
|Subjects:||G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH541 Ecology
|Divisions:||Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)|
|Depositing User:||Joseph Tzanopoulos|
|Date Deposited:||10 Oct 2012 21:48|
|Last Modified:||12 Feb 2013 11:58|
|Resource URI:||http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/30025 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)|
- Depositors only (login required):