Skip to main content

Who can recognize unfamiliar faces? Individual differences and observer consistency in person identification

Bindemann, Markus, Avetisyan, Meri, Rakow, Tim (2012) Who can recognize unfamiliar faces? Individual differences and observer consistency in person identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18 . pp. 277-291. ISSN 1076-898X. (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:29602)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided.

Abstract

It can be remarkably difficult to determine if two photographs of unfamiliar faces depict the same person or two different people. This fallibility is well established in the face perception and eyewitness domain, but most of this research has focused on the “average” observer by measuring mean performance across groups of participants. This study deviated from this convention to provide a detailed description of individual differences and observer consistency in unfamiliar face identification by assessing performance repeatedly, across a three-day (Experiment 1) and a five-day period (Experiment 2). Both experiments reveal considerable variation between but also within observers. This variation is such that the same observers frequently made different identification decisions to the same faces on different days (Experiment 1). And when new faces were shown on each day, observers that produced perfect accuracy on one day made many misidentifications on another (Experiment 2). However, a few individuals also performed with consistent high accuracy in these tests. These findings suggest that accuracy and consistency are separable indices of face-matching ability, and both measures are necessary to provide a precise index of a person’s face processing skill. We discuss whether these measures could provide the basis for a selection tool for occupations that depend on accurate person identification.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: Markus Bindemann
Date Deposited: 05 Jun 2012 10:03 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 10:07 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/29602 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.