Russo, F. and Williamson, J. (2011) Epistemic causality and evidence-based medicine. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 33 (4). pp. 563-582. ISSN 0391-9714.
|The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)|
Causal claims in biomedical contexts are ubiquitous albeit they are not always made explicit. This paper addresses the question of what causal claims mean in the context of disease. It is argued that in medical contexts causality ought to be interpreted according to the epistemic theory. The epistemic theory offers an alternative to traditional accounts that cash out causation either in terms of “difference-making” relations or in terms of mechanisms. According to the epistemic approach, causal claims tell us about which inferences (e.g., diagnoses and prognoses) are appropriate, rather than about the presence of some physical causal relation analogous to distance or gravitational attraction. It is shown that the epistemic theory has important consequences for medical practice, in particular with regard to evidence-based causal assessment.
|Uncontrolled keywords:||Bradford Hill’s Guidelines, Causality, Disease Causation, Epistemic Causality, Evidence-Based Medicine, Russo-Williamson Thesis|
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
|Divisions:||Faculties > Humanities > School of European Culture and Languages|
|Depositing User:||Jon Williamson|
|Date Deposited:||20 Mar 2012 16:20|
|Last Modified:||28 Mar 2012 09:27|
|Resource URI:||http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/29181 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)|
- Depositors only (login required):