Mckenna, Alan (2012) 'Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd and Willmore v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council: A Material Contribution to Uncertainty?': A Response. Working paper. Social Science Research Network 10.2139/ssrn.1989470.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
This short article is a response piece to a case note review of the U.K. Supreme Court judgment in the case of Sienkiewicz v Greif (2011), and seeks to challenge the argument made in the case note that epidemiological evidence, and scientific evidence in general are as a result of the decision reached by the Supreme Court to be considered as having little or no validity in mesothelioma actions.
|Item Type:||Monograph (Working paper)|
|Uncontrolled keywords:||asbestos, mesothelioma, epidemiology, causation, Sienkiewicz, Willmore, supreme court|
|Divisions:||Faculties > Social Sciences > Kent Law School|
|Depositing User:||Jenny Harmer|
|Date Deposited:||14 Mar 2012 10:32|
|Last Modified:||16 Mar 2012 10:22|
|Resource URI:||http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/29021 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)|
- Depositors only (login required):