Mckenna, Alan (2012) 'Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd and Willmore v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council: A Material Contribution to Uncertainty?': A Response. Working paper. Social Science Research Network 10.2139/ssrn.1989470.
|
PDF
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. |
||
|
Download (150Kb)
Preview
|
|
|
| Official URL http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1989470 |
||
Abstract
This short article is a response piece to a case note review of the U.K. Supreme Court judgment in the case of Sienkiewicz v Greif (2011), and seeks to challenge the argument made in the case note that epidemiological evidence, and scientific evidence in general are as a result of the decision reached by the Supreme Court to be considered as having little or no validity in mesothelioma actions.
| Item Type: | Monograph (Working paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled keywords: | asbestos, mesothelioma, epidemiology, causation, Sienkiewicz, Willmore, supreme court |
| Subjects: | K Law |
| Divisions: | Faculties > Social Sciences > Kent Law School |
| Depositing User: | Jenny Harmer |
| Date Deposited: | 14 Mar 2012 10:32 |
| Last Modified: | 16 Mar 2012 10:22 |
| Resource URI: | http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/29021 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Depositors only (login required):
