Skip to main content

Bring the captive closer to the wild: redefining the role of ex situ conservation

Pritchard, Diana J., Fa, John E., Oldfield, Sara, Harrop, Stuart R. (2012) Bring the captive closer to the wild: redefining the role of ex situ conservation. Oryx, 46 (1). pp. 18-23. ISSN 0030-6053. (doi:10.1017/S0030605310001766) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:28221)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided.
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605310001766

Abstract

In situ conservation is central to contemporary

global biodiversity protection and is the predominant

emphasis of international regulation and funding strategies.

Ex situ approaches, in contrast, have been relegated to

a subsidiary role and their direct contributions to conservation

have been limited. We draw on a variety of sources to

make the case for an enhanced role for ex situ conservation.

We note the advances occurring within institutions specializing

in ex situ conservation and stress that, although much

remains to be done, many constraints are being addressed.

We argue that the evidence of increasing extinction rates,

exacerbated by climate change, challenges the wisdom of

a heavy dependence on in situ strategies and necessitates

increased development of ex situ approaches. A number of

different techniques that enable species and their habitats to

survive should now be explored. These could build on the

experience of management systems that have already

demonstrated the effective integration of in situ and ex situ

techniques and hybrid approaches. For organizations specializing

in ex situ conservation to become more effective,

however, they will require tangible support from the

institutions of global biodiversity governance. Resistance is

anticipated because in situ conservation is entrenched

through powerful groups and organizations that exert

influence on global conservation policy and facilitate the

flow of funding. The chasm that has traditionally divided in

situ and ex situ approaches may diminish as approaches are

combined. Moreover, the relentless loss of the ‘wild’ may

soon render the in situ / ex situ distinction misleading, or

even obsolete.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1017/S0030605310001766
Uncontrolled keywords: Botanical gardens, captive breeding, climate change, ex situ, in situ, zoos.
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
S Agriculture > SB Plant culture
S Agriculture > SF Animal culture
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
Depositing User: Stuart Harrop
Date Deposited: 12 Oct 2011 12:18 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 10:06 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/28221 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Harrop, Stuart R..

Creator's ORCID:
CReDIT Contributor Roles:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.