Murphy, Amy O. and Sutton, R.M. and Douglas, K.M. and McClellan, L.M. (2011) Ambivalent sexism and the “do”s and “don’t”s of pregnancy: Examining attitudes toward proscriptions and the women who flout them. Personality and Individual Differences, 51 (7). pp. 812-816. ISSN 0191-8869.
|The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)|
Pregnant women are subjected to popular and official advice to restrict their behaviour in ways that may not always be warranted by medical evidence. The present paper investigates the role of sexism in the proscriptive stance toward pregnancy. Consistent with expectations, both hostile and benevolent sexism were associated with endorsement of proscriptive rules such as “pregnant women should not take strenuous exercise” (Study 1, n =148). Also as predicted, hostile but not benevolent sexism was associated with punitive attitudes to pregnant women who flout proscriptions (Study 2, n = 124). In tandem with recent findings, the present results show that hostile as well as benevolent sexism is associated with proscriptive attitudes surrounding pregnancy.
|Uncontrolled keywords:||Pregnancy, paternalism, sexism, ambivalent, hostile, benevolent|
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics
|Divisions:||Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Psychology > Social Psychology
|Depositing User:||Robbie Sutton|
|Date Deposited:||27 Jul 2011 09:34|
|Last Modified:||11 Nov 2011 10:37|
|Resource URI:||http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/28030 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)|
- Depositors only (login required):