Alaszewski, A.M. (2000) Professional judgement and risk: process or outcome? Community Care Collaboration . pp. 2-3.
|The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)|
In the wake of the Bristol disater the Government proposes to make Chief Executives of NHS Trusts accountable to Parliament for the quality of decisions made by doctors, nurses and other health professionals through the process of clinical governance. However, the precise nature and meaning of clinical governance not only failed to define it but placed it alongside professional self-regulation without specifying how and in what ways the two processes were linked.
|Additional information:||NHS Executive Northern and Yorkshire, R&D Portfolio Programme at the Nuffield Institute for Health|
|Uncontrolled keywords:||clinical governance, health professionals, risk,|
|Subjects:||R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
|Divisions:||Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Social Policy Sociology and Social Research > Centre for Health Services Studies|
|Depositing User:||Tony Rees|
|Date Deposited:||14 Sep 2010 09:57|
|Last Modified:||14 Sep 2010 09:57|
|Resource URI:||http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/25504 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)|
- Depositors only (login required):