Skip to main content

Case-Study - Fieldwork In Undergraduate Anthropology - For And Against

Watson, Bill (1995) Case-Study - Fieldwork In Undergraduate Anthropology - For And Against. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32 (2). pp. 153-161. ISSN 1355-8005. (doi:10.1080/1355800950320210) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:19125)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided.
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1355800950320210

Abstract

There is some disagreement among teaching anthropologists in Britain about whether fieldwork for undergraduates should be encouraged. This paper discusses some of the relevant arguments on both sides and describes some of the courses in which fieldwork currently has a place. In the last part of the paper I describe my own recent experience trying to introduce a fieldwork element into a new course, and I examine the success and failure of the course in the light of the current arguments.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1080/1355800950320210
Subjects: L Education
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation
Depositing User: I.T. Ekpo
Date Deposited: 26 Oct 2009 16:17 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 09:57 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/19125 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Watson, Bill.

Creator's ORCID:
CReDIT Contributor Roles:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.