Marques, J.M. and Abrams, D. and Paez, D. and Martinez-Taboada, C. (1998) The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (4). pp. 976-988. ISSN 0022-3514.
|
PDF
Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
|
| Contact us about this Publication
Download (1177Kb)
|
|
| Official URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.976 |
|
Abstract
Four minimal group experiments tested the prediction that judgments of groups and their members reflect evaluations made simultaneously but independently at the within-group and intergroup levels. On the basis of self-categorization theory and social identity theory, it was predicted that group members seek both intergroup distinctiveness and legitimization of in-group norms. In Experiments 1-3, membership (in-group, out-group), status of group members (modal, deviant), and either accountability to in-group or to out-group or salience of group norms were varied. Accountability and norm salience increased derogation of out-group normative (in-group deviant, out-group modal) and upgrading of in-group normative (in-group modal, out-group deviant) members. In Experiment 4, within-group differentiation reinforced in-group identification. These findings suggest that subjective group dynamics operate to bolster social identity when people judge modal and deviant in-group and out-group members.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion |
| Divisions: | Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Psychology |
| Depositing User: | M.A. Ziai |
| Date Deposited: | 30 Mar 2009 12:13 |
| Last Modified: | 06 Sep 2011 02:22 |
| Resource URI: | http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/17437 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Depositors only (login required):

