Polaschek, D.L.L. and Gannon, T.A. (2004) The implicit theories of rapists: What convicted offenders tell us. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16 (4). pp. 299-314. ISSN 1573-286X .
|The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)|
Twenty years of research into sex offenders'' cognitive distortions has primarily focused on the measurement of distortions rather than on theorizing about the underlying structures that are responsible for generating and organizing them. Recently T. Ward (2000; T. Ward & T. Keenan, 1999) suggested that offenders have underlying causal theories about themselves, their victims, and broader categories of people (e.g., women and children), and that these implicit theories enable post hoc explanation as well as prediction of people''s actions and reactions. D. L. L. Polaschek and T. Ward (2002) examined rape-related attitudinal scales and constructed and outlined five core implicit theories. Here, we examined whether evidence for these five theories was also found in offense process descriptions generated from interviews with 37 imprisoned rapists. Coding of the descriptions revealed support for all five theories.
|Uncontrolled keywords:||implicit theories; schemas; rapists' cognitive distortions|
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion|
|Divisions:||Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Psychology > Applied Psychology|
|Depositing User:||Theresa Gannon|
|Date Deposited:||29 May 2009 16:04|
|Last Modified:||29 May 2009 16:04|
|Resource URI:||http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/14979 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)|
- Depositors only (login required):