Haslam, Emily and Dembour, M-B. (2004) Silencing Hearings? Victim/Witnesses at War Crimes Trials. European Journal of International Law, 15 (1). pp. 151-177. ISSN 09385428. (The full text of this publication is not available from this repository)
|The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)|
It is commonly accepted that war crimes trials should provide a space for victims to tell their stories. A close reading of the transcripts of victim-witnesses’ testimonies in the Krstic trial at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia suggests, however, that war crimes trials effectively silence, rather than hear, victims. In this particular trial, victim-witnesses predictably governed neither the agenda nor the pace of the hearings. More problematically, we argue that incongruously optimistic judicial remarks unnecessarily denied their suffering. On a different plane, victims’ testimonies were only vaguely connected to the person of the accused; they related to facts the relevance and proof of which are debatable. This article aims to generate a debate about victim-witnesses’ testimonies at war crimes trials. It seeks to identify both the demands that the legal process imposes on victim-witnesses and the tensions that arise out of their participation in it. In the light of the fact that legal proceedings cannot produce the definitive collective memory of the events with which they deal, the article finally stresses the need to foster a variety of collective memories outside the judicial platform.
|Divisions:||Faculties > Social Sciences > Kent Law School|
|Depositing User:||Katrin Steinack|
|Date Deposited:||19 Dec 2007 18:00|
|Last Modified:||04 May 2012 13:41|
|Resource URI:||http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/131 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)|