Kirchin, S.T. (2005) What is Intuitionism and Why be an Intuitionist? Social Theory and Practice, 31 (4). pp. 581-606. ISSN 0037-802X.
|The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)|
This paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of ethical intuitionism and is an extended critical discussion of an edited collection Rethinking Intutionism (ed.) Stratton-Lake (OUP) that has been much discussed. (My piece is one of the first discussions of it.) Along other matters, I argue for the original and fairly controversial claim that in order for intuitionism to hold water, we must allow that what is involved in full moral understanding can differ from person to person, rather than thinking that if a claim can be intuited rather than proved, everyone who intuits it understands it in the same way.
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)|
|Divisions:||Faculties > Humanities > School of European Culture and Languages|
|Depositing User:||Maureen Nunn|
|Date Deposited:||19 Dec 2007 18:48|
|Last Modified:||22 Nov 2011 15:37|
|Resource URI:||http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/1225 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)|
- Depositors only (login required):