Fearne, A. and Hobbs, J. and Spriggs, J. (2002) Incentive Structures for Food Safety and Quality Assurance: An International Comparison. Food Control, 13 (2). pp. 77-81. ISSN 0956-7135.
|The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)|
This paper compares the incentive structures for changes in food safety legislation and in private sector business strategies in the UK, Canada and Australia. The experiences of these countries with respect to food safety scares is quite different, leading to different incentives for change and alternative legislative and private sector responses. In the UK, incentives were primarily related to crisis management and the restoration of consumer confidence following a number of high profile food safety scares. In Canada and Australia, the policy focus has been on risk management and the prevention of trade-threatening food safety issues. Private sector responses to food safety have included the growth of vertical alliances in the UK and Australian beef industries. These are less evident in Canada. The three-country comparison presented in this paper highlights the importance of incentives for change in determining the respective roles of public policy and private sector responses to food safety issues.
|Uncontrolled keywords:||Food safety; Quality assurance; Risk management; Crisis management; Vertical alliances|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences|
|Divisions:||Faculties > Social Sciences > Kent Business School|
|Depositing User:||Andrew Fearne|
|Date Deposited:||03 Oct 2008 00:21|
|Last Modified:||14 Jan 2010 14:47|
|Resource URI:||http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/11859 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)|
- Depositors only (login required):